Twinkle 16 / Brainstorming scenario
Revolving doors: a register and a cooling-off clock
Apply a transparent post-office conflict standard to P4A's own participants first, then propose it for public office. Decisions, subsequent employment and related lobbying should be traceable.
The revolving door joins public decisions to later private employment. A source-linked timeline could make conflicts and restrictions visible enough to question and enforce.
Explore the connected work
- Relevance: Australian law - The source-led method for following legal threads and understanding how laws touch an ordinary life. Source repository
- Australian Legal Engine - Offline code that parses, indexes and retrieves quoted statutory provisions with source citations. It does not decide a legal case. Source repository
How it could work
- Record relevant portfolios, decisions, declared interests and subsequent industry roles in a searchable register.
- An independent reviewer sets proportionate restrictions for each conflict, with a published clock, reasons and appeal.
- Require contact records and recusals for affected procurement or regulatory decisions; publish breaches and remedies.
Everyday example
If a former minister works for an industry they regulated, the public can see what is restricted and when the restriction ends.
Who could act and how it could be funded
Each parliament and integrity framework needs its own rule changes; parties can adopt stronger internal standards now. Fund independent review and register maintenance, separate from the office-holder's discretion.
Fair-go safeguards
Do not ban ordinary livelihoods without a relevant conflict test. Protect whistleblowers and personal contact details. No revolving-door allegation without a documented timeline and response.
What would show progress
Disclosures on time; restricted contacts identified; independent decisions published; breaches remedied.
